Solodko Shkuridin
6.1.1Publications
with sources

Insights

The limits of investigative powers, divergences in judicial positions, and the application of provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. The materials in this section draw on open sources.

6.1.2Register
10 articles
DatePublicationStatus
06.08.20266.1.2.1Entrapment: where the line lies and who must prove ittext available on the site
06.07.20266.1.2.2The Interdepartmental Working Group on State Sanctions Policy under the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine — the institution no one talks abouttext available on the site
19.07.20256.1.2.3The devil’s advocate is now censorship? Legal positions and the experience of partner countriestext available on the site
12.02.20246.1.2.4CLASSIFIED: how the prosecution seeks to stretch the limits of covert investigative actionstext available on the site
04.05.20236.1.2.5A clash of views: a judge’s separate opinion against the inconsistency of the Criminal Cassation Court on Article 214(7) of the Criminal Procedure Codetext available on the site
19.04.20236.1.2.6Shades of privacy: judicial control and the limits of interference with private communicationtext available on the site
13.04.20236.1.2.7A search at the minimum: why the full text of the investigating judge’s ruling matterstext available on the site
07.04.20236.1.2.8The Criminal Procedure Code in the hands of HACC and Supreme Court judges: who will prevail in the contest of interpretations?text available on the site
28.03.20236.1.2.9Caution, divergent case-law: at what stage Article 284(1)(10) of the Criminal Procedure Code applies — the practice of HACC and the Supreme Courttext available on the site
27.03.20236.1.2.10A battle with time: the Supreme Court and HACC in different camps on pre-trial investigation time limitstext available on the site